CCL:RIMM vs SDRAM (fwd)
Eugene.Leitl at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Tue Oct 23 10:10:57 PDT 2001
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 08:34:14 -0600
From: Scott Anderson <anderson at chem.utah.edu>
To: chemistry at ccl.net
Subject: CCL:RIMM vs SDRAM
Regarding your question about RIMM (RDRAM) v.s. SDRAM (or DDR SDRAM) for
I have done a fair bit of comparing machines for Gaussian, as I am planning
to buy a bunch in the near future. I have been using an MP2 Opt Freq job
that takes a few hours as my benchmark. I have also run much longer Direct
Dynamics trajectory jobs on several different configurations. The MP2 job
was deliberately chose to avoid a lot of disk i/o because I really wanted to
focus on the computational speed. I have compared 1 and 1.4 GHz Athlons,
PIIIs, and P4s. The conclusion is that for Gaussian, the P4 is 20-30%
faster than the Athlons for the same clock speed, and since you can get P4s
with faster clocks, the P4 ends up being substantially faster. This speed
difference is quite surprising because the P4 floating point unit is
substantially inferior to that of the Athlon, and as far as I have been able
to determine, the rate deterimining step for these fast chips is memory
speed. Here the RDRAM really shines. I have also compared Athlons with
PC133 SDRAM and PC2100 DDR ram, which is theoretically substantially faster.
For Gaussian jobs, I see no difference.
One interesting thing to look at in this regard is the review in the Tom's
Hardware review of the new Athlon XP.
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/01q4/011009/index.html They compare
several different Athlons with different memory configurations, and also
2GHz P4s with both RDRAM and DDR memory. The Athlon XP looks great on most
of the benchmarks -- equalling or exceeding the P4, even though the P4 clock
speed is much higher. The one area where the XP fails, however, is memory
speed. Note that the P4 with RDRAM does 50% better than the P4 with DDR,
and nearly a factor of two better than the Athlons with either PC133 or DDR
1. Gaussian is probably memory-bandwidth limited, and you should spend the
extra money RDRAM.
2. DDR memory doesn't really make a huge difference -- certainly nothing
like the factor of two you might expect.
3. The ideal configuration is very application dependent. For Gaussian, I
would go with the P4. If you are running a mix of programs, you really have
a tough decision.
Prof. Scott L. Anderson
Department of Chemistry
University of Utah
315 S. 1400 E. Rm 1216
Salt Lake City, UT 84112
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Kuppens" <tom at hartree4.rug.ac.be>
To: <chemistry at ccl.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:07 AM
Subject: CCL:RIMM vs SDRAM
> Hi there,
> We have several linux machines that run Gaussian. Now we want to add some
> power to our park i.e. a PIV - 1700MhZ with 512M RAM (SDRAM or RIMM).
> Is there someone who can provide me with some info on the Gaussian and/or
> overall performance with RIMM versus SDRAM modules.
> Thanks in advance,
> Tom Kuppens
> Ghent University
> tom at hartree4.ac.be
> It seems to me, Golan, that the advance of civilization is nothing
> but an exercise in the limiting of privacy.
> -- Janov Pelorat in Asimov's Foundation's Edge
> CHEMISTRY at ccl.net -- To Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST at ccl.net -- To
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH at ccl.net -- archive search | Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net | WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/ | Jan:
jkl at osc.edu
-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY at ccl.net -- To Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST at ccl.net -- To Admins
MAILSERV at ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH at ccl.net -- archive search | Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net | WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/ | Jan: jkl at osc.edu
More information about the Beowulf