PVFS and Software RAID

Michael Eilers mcelln at hotmail.com
Mon Jan 22 08:09:39 PST 2001

Maybe "drbd" (http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/reisner/drbd/) is the 

Michael Eilers
eilers at linux-buero.de

>As far as I know, neither approach will work.  The only way I know to 
>redundancy is to put two drives in each node, use software RAID to create a
>redundant system on each node, and then use PVFS to get parallel data
>This will protect you from disk failure, but not from node failure.  In the
>of node failure you would have to repair or replace the node and bring it 
>up with disks intact.  This prevents data loss, but does not insure high
>If the software RAID drivers have recently gained the ability to do 
>across the network, I didn't know that and I'd like to hear about it.
> > I'm sure this problem has been discussed here, but maybe we could go 
> > it again.
> >
> > Problem: I have four boxes with a 9 GB file system (/dev/hda7) in each
> > box. I would like to use them all to create one 18 GB file system that 
> > redundant. Is it better to use PVFS on two pairs of drives to create 2 
> > GB file systems and then use Software Raid to make these redundant. Or 
> > it better to use Software Raid to make 2 9 GB redundant file systems and
> > then create the 18 GB file system with PVFS?
> >
> > Kevin.
> >
> > *********************************
> >     Online and On Demand HPC
> >       Pay per Use CPU Time
> >   www.tsunamictechnologies.com
> > *********************************
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Beowulf mailing list
> > Beowulf at beowulf.org
> > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>Dr. Walter B. Ligon III
>Associate Professor
>ECE Department
>Clemson University
>Beowulf mailing list
>Beowulf at beowulf.org

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

More information about the Beowulf mailing list