James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.gov
Wed Feb 21 15:39:10 PST 2001
If it is that coarsely grained, why not just use 1 NIC in each machine
hooked up as a standard shared media Ethernet (i.e. using Coax T's)? Or do
you need the network bandwidth from node to node, in which case multiple
NICs starts to make sense ( I assume NICs and cabling are free?). Then,
you'd want to use one of the schemes used with 10BaseT hubs (as opposed to
switches) which is conceptually the same as a multidrop coax configuration.
As for DHCP.... It sounds like a nightmare to debug.. is there a good reason
not to use static IPs assigned in a regular pattern, making building the
routing tables somewhat easier?
From: Nigel Weeks <nigel at aims.com.au>
To: Beowulf (E-mail) <beowulf at beowulf.org>
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: Interconnect Diagrams
>Hi fellow beowulfers,
>I'm setting up a toy beowulf, with 4 10base-2 (coax) nics in each box(IT
>REALLY IS A TOY)
>I'm wondering if anyone has any ideas on how to arrange the mesh, so that
>each of the 32 machines can use DHCP from the one master...
>The task is super-coarse grained - massive povray jobs(1600x1200, one frame
>per box. (2 hours per work unit)
>Diagrams would be great, but I understand that network arrangements are
>difficult to draw.
>AIMS Independent Computer Professionals
>15 Wellington St. Launceston Tas 7250
>Ph. 61 3 6334 6664
>Fax. 61 3 6331 7032
>Email. nigel at aims.com.au
>Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
>To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
More information about the Beowulf