hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca
Mon Dec 10 12:17:23 PST 2001
> mount -t tmpfs /dev/shm /tmp
> And in theory, the numbers I've seen tend to show that this is a bit
> faster than having /tmp in the vfs cache path. Though I'm not an
> expert on the topic.
generally, filesystems try to be synchronous with metadata,
that is, directory entries, inodes, etc. so you'd be avoiding
that traffic by using tmpfs. file *contents* tend to be lazily
written out by filesystems anyway, so there's probably
no savings there. (depends on timing)
> However, I have noticed that on our compile box
> (since gcc tends to toss it's temp .o files in /tmp) it's a bit lighter
> on the drive.
gcc -pipe avoids that traffic...
More information about the Beowulf