interesting Athlon/P4 discussion from FreeBSD-Q-l

Mark Hahn hahn at
Wed Apr 18 21:53:52 PDT 2001

> > the P4 is not exceptional
> > when running real code in-cache; this is why on most benchmarks
> > other than Stream, recent Athlons beat P4's quite handily.
> Like SPEC2000fp, for example?

notice the "in-cache" there.  yes, there is such a thing as real code 
that is happy with 384 KB cache.

> > and that's why AMD is having such an awsome time in the market now,
> > and why Intel is cutting prices so dramatically on the P4.
> That's true in the overall market. I thought this was the Beowulf
> mailing list? Do you think that a majority of beowulf users can
> re-compile their own codes, or do they use shrink-wrapped binaries
> from vendors who are unwilling to re-compile for the P4?

I find it terribly amusing that you're so offended by someone saying that
Athlon is a viable alternative to the P4.  it's obviously true.  being
interested in high-performance clustering of commodity hardware does not
somehow rule out decent cache hit rates.

besides, the real problem with the P4 is rdram's price.

More information about the Beowulf mailing list