[Beowulf] RE: Storage - the end of RAID?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comFri Oct 29 12:45:55 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Storage - the end of RAID?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SC10 Beowulf Bash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:46:35PM -0400, Ellis H. Wilson III wrote: >>> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/storage/the-end-of-raid/1154?tag=nl.e539 > The major issue I see with the article is that the author refers to RAID > being "dead" when really he should be saying RAID 2-6 is less preferable > to RAID 1 (but it does make for a "catchier" article title). What I think original article author, Robin Harris, probably knew, but didn't point out explicitly, is that all the official "RAID" algorithms are ** block oriented **, RAID-1 just as much as RAID-5, and *that's* why they're "dead". The only question how long it'll take for better solutions to become widespread enough for us to ditch block-oriented RAID entirely. Everything else Harris mentions is just supporting detail. ZFS and Btrfs seem to have the right approach; end-to-end data assurance provided by the file system. I look forward to the time when I can easily use it for real on all my computers. -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: Storage - the end of RAID?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SC10 Beowulf Bash
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
