[Beowulf] China Wrests Supercomputer Title From U.S.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comThu Oct 28 23:46:28 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] China Wrests Supercomputer Title From U.S.
- Next message: [Beowulf] China Wrests Supercomputer Title From U.S.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:55:32PM -0500, Alan Louis Scheinine wrote: > With regard to networks, a near-future fork in the road between Beowulf > clusters versus supercomputers may be the intelligence concerning global > memory added to the network interface chip for upcoming models of supercomputers. Yawn. First we had the attack of the killer micros. Now we have the attack of the commodity interconnects. Do these special interconnects with fancy global memory justify their cost vs. InfiniBand + HPC tweaks? Do you really think you're going to program these machines with something other than MPI? Make your bets, wait, see if you win. -- greg ps. I am pleased to see that the new EXTOLL interconnect has a non-RDMA short message system. pps. Blekko launches November 1. Check out the /hpc slashtag.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] China Wrests Supercomputer Title From U.S.
- Next message: [Beowulf] China Wrests Supercomputer Title From U.S.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
