[Beowulf] first cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon Jul 12 21:29:13 PDT 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Gus Correa <gus at ldeo.columbia.edu> wrote: > Consider disk for: > > A) swap space (say, if the user programs are large, > or you can't buy a lot of RAM, etc); Out of curiosity, is there the possibility of running a "swapless" compute-node? I mean most HPC nodes already have fairly generous RAM and once swapping to disk starts performance is degraded (severely?). Are there non-problem scenarios where one does desire swapping to disks? > D) Most current node chassis have hot-swappable disks, not hard to replace, > in case of failure. Hot-swappable disks are great on head nodes but on compute-nodes whenever I hear "redundant" or "hot swappable", I see it as an inefficiency. Or a excessive feature that could be traded off for a cost saving. (of course, sometimes hands are tied if the server comes with that feature "standard") What do others think? -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] first cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
