[Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netThu Feb 25 18:27:25 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >Regardless of how tight the seastar per-hop latency is, >IB has 2.5x the per-hop fanout (2or 3 outgoing 9.6 GB links >versus 18 outgoing 4 GB/s links). higher radix means an >advantage that increases with size. Doesn't this assume worst case all-to-all type communication patterns. If you are just trading ghost cell data with your neighbors and you have placed your job smartly on the torus the fan out advantage mentioned is irrelevant. No? rbw _______________________________________________ Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org sponsored by Penguin Computing To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20100226/df852d00/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
