[Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caThu Feb 25 13:53:59 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> BTW, is Cray SeaStar2+ better than IB - for nodes w/many cores ? BW seems like a SeaStar2+ advantage, though I haven't seen any discussion of latency or message rate. > And I didn't see latencies comparison for SeaStar vs IB. my guess is that for short routes, seastar is competitive, but can fall behind on large machines (long routes). regardless of how tight the seastar per-hop latency is, IB has 2.5x the per-hop fanout (2or 3 outgoing 9.6 GB links versus 18 outgoing 4 GB/s links). higher radix means an advantage that increases with size.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Q: IB message rate & large core counts (per node) ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
