[Beowulf] which mpi library should I focus on?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Paul Johnson pauljohn32 at gmail.comSat Feb 20 10:49:45 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] case (de)construction question
- Next message: [Beowulf] which mpi library should I focus on?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
i've not written MPI programs before. I've written plenty of C and Java, however, and I think I can learn. I'm trying to decide whether to concentrate on OpenMPI or MPICH2 as I get started. In the Internet, I find plenty of people who are fiercely devoted to MPICH2, and I also find plenty of people who say OpenMPI is now the "preferred application". I am afraid I will start a flame war between these two sides, but I do need some advice. My immediate goal is to write programs that can parallelize statistical analysis (mostly medium sized calculations that have to be run 1000s of times from various starting random number seeds). Many of the projects that we do will be in R, which has several packages that can be built for MPI framework (such as SNOW or such), but the installer must select which MPI library to build those packages against. What are the reasons to prefer one or the other? pj -- Paul E. Johnson Professor, Political Science 1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504 University of Kansas
- Previous message: [Beowulf] case (de)construction question
- Next message: [Beowulf] which mpi library should I focus on?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
