[Beowulf] Any recommendations for a good JBOD?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSat Feb 20 03:35:06 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Any recommendations for a good JBOD?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Any recommendations for a good JBOD?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Cutts wrote: > on between the two. We've been looking at iSCSI for our VMware setup in > the future. As people have been saying, performance isn't stellar, an > to get it decent you still end up paying a lot of money on networking > kit, because ideally in that scenario you still want the storage traffic Hmmm... Our sub $10k USD units sport 10GbE/IB interfaces and do more than 500 MB/s over iSCSI, sustained. We've been demonstrating this for ~1.25 years. No more expensive than other technologies. Much less expensive than some others. Yeah, I know, the vast majority of iSCSI users use it over GbE. Most of the units on the market from others have trouble keeping that single GbE pipe filled, and they are expensive kit. > But for HPC? Nah - can't really see its utility. It is in use and its use is growing. Look at iSCSI as glue logic between systems. You can use SAS to connect arrays, then you need an expander chip in the backplane for the array (talk about a performance killer ...). You can use FC to connect arrays, with the same types of issues (no expander chip, but a massive oversubscription of bandwidth, and really expensive networking kit). Or you can use point to point iSCSI, or iSCSI over a switch. We've done and seen both the point to point and networked version. Works great for its use cases. For massively oversubscribed SAS/FC networks, the iSCSI systems come in less expensive. For point to point connections (using iSCSI as a wire protocol to directly attach RAIDed arrays or JBOD arrays, or mixtures, to a server) it works great, and you can do multipathing without additional switches ... as well as doing fail-over connections, including background replication over a private iSCSI to iSCSI network to have HA storage. It has lots of utility. Its relatively cheap, and if you get from the right vendors, its as fast as some others "fast" and expensive solutions. Of course, we are biased given what we sell. > > Tim > > -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics, Inc. email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://scalableinformatics.com http://scalableinformatics.com/jackrabbit phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Any recommendations for a good JBOD?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Any recommendations for a good JBOD?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
