[Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comTue Feb 16 10:57:15 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 02:08:32AM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > I'm curious: you imply that vendors have no recourse to force the _disk_ > vendors to supply parts which work right (as defined by standard). > is that really true? I'd be surprised if Dell doesn't get pretty emphatic > cooperation from their disk vendor(s). If you recall our past discussions here about "raid duty" disks, there are a couple of things not in the standard which are significant: vibration resistance, and the disk's maximum retry time vs. raid controllers deciding there's a timout. Most standards have problems like that. You can't imagine the interesting time PathScale had getting our InfiniBand products to cooperate well with Mellanox parts. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
