[Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rahul Nabar rpnabar at gmail.comMon Feb 15 09:51:28 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
This was the response from Dell, I especially like the analogy: [snip] >There are a number of benefits for using Dell qualified drives in particular ensuring a ***positive experience*** and protecting ***our data***. >While SAS and SATA are industry standards there are differences which occur in implementation. An analogy is that English is spoken in the UK, US >and Australia. While the language is generally the same, there are subtle differences in word usage which can lead to confusion. This exists in >storage subsystems as well. As these subsystems become more capable, faster and more complex, these differences in implementation can have >greater impact. [snip] I added the emphasis. I am in love Dell-disks that get me "the positive experience". :) -- Rahul
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Third-party drives not permitted on new Dell servers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
