[Beowulf] top500 clusters using
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Feb 3 13:27:00 PST 2010
- Previous message: [Beowulf] top500 clusters using
- Next message: [Beowulf] problem of mpich-1.2.7p1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Last top500 lists contain a set of sites which are not from HPC world. sure - it always has. top500 is not particularly HPC-specific, since linpack only weakly measures important factors like memory and interconnect bandwidth and latency. the main appeal of linpack is that it's pretty well-understood and uses hardware (FPUs) present in all conventional machines... > I understand that there may be parallelized applications which may use whole > cluster for one task, but this task isn't floating-point oriented. I would almost say that linpack is not particularly about FP (since you can derive integer rates from the scores if you want.) > etc. IMHO they may use clusters for Web-hosting etc, where may be load > balancing is used. I.e. it's not "supercomputer" (I means computer, all > CPUs/cores of which may be used for solving of one task). I think it's more common than you think for clusters to be load-balanced among many applications - or conversely that single-job clusters, which might strictly be called "capability", are rare.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] top500 clusters using
- Next message: [Beowulf] problem of mpich-1.2.7p1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
