[Beowulf] Cluster Networking
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.eduWed Jul 15 20:40:21 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Networking
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >>> 1. Is there any influence on performance of a NFS-server from the >> usage >>> of x32 CPU and OS instead of x64, if all other characteristics of the > > 64bitness is, at this level, purely a matter of register width, number and > address-space size. it might very well be that an NFS server would show > an advantage to 64b if configured with a very large pagecache and a read > friendly workload. > >>> system, i.e. amount of RAM, soft-SATA-II RAID 0, Realtek GLAN NIC are >>> the same? >> >> I would say no - but I don't run any 32 bit machines as NFS servers! > > I can't think of any reason to prefer 64b for NFS servers, except that > 32b-only machines tend to be older (and thus limited in memory and IO > bandwidth). > >> Being even more honest, I would look at this Realtek NIC and consider >> putting in >> An Intel E1000 based card. Also look closely at network tuning > > I'd be pretty surprised if any Gb nic couldn't manage wire speed. Then you haven't had my horrible experience with Broadcom 5708's. -- Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager at tamu.edu Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.862.3983 Office: 1700 Research Parkway Ste 160, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Networking
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
