[Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caWed Jul 15 18:57:56 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Rather than looking at the solution, could you describe the problem you >> need to solve? > > I've been building cheap, big, slow storage servers for our use. However, > some of our users are starting to need higher performance IO. We still don't > have a lot of money, but I'd like to provide something with a modest amount > of storage (at least 500GB) that can at least handle full GigE, perhaps up to > DDR Infiniband for future expansion, without breaking the bank. if you can't saturate gigabit with very modest raids, you're doing something wrong. a single ultra-cheap disk these days (seagate 7200.12 500G, $60 or so) will hit close to 135 MB/s on outer tracks and average > 105 over the whole disk. I'm guessing that you're losing performance due to either bad controllers (avoid HW raid on anything that's not fairly recent) or a combination of raid6 and a write-heavy workload... bandwidth is easy; latency is hard. the only time I'd consider flash for storage is if the workload was astonishingly write-dominated. or for a pretty large cluster (for instance, the metadata write load for a a few thousand jobs can _flatten_ an indifferently configured Lustre system, even though the bandwidth is fairly low.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Next message: [Beowulf] storage server hardware considerations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
