[Beowulf] technical comparison of different MPI-implementations?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Nogotheg nogotheg at gmail.comThu Feb 26 17:07:29 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small distro for PXE boot, autostarts sshd?
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE:small distro for PXE boot, autostarts sshd?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello list, some nice guys told me to ask the pros for my question and adress myself to the beowulf-list. After searching the archives with different search terms, I decided to ask this question on the list - hoping it wasn't asked that often before ;-). Could anybody of you point me to some readings (manuals, papers, websites) where different open source MPI-implementations are compared? I don't ask for some suggestion which one to use. I want to dig into that for myself (even though I always welcome any help ;-) ) and have a look into the code. So any writings about the technical details (like _how_ is openmpi treating shm compared to mpich, _why_ is lam-mpi better when using ethernet than FOO-mpi, etc.). Thank you very much for your time (and please don't hesitate to point me to some FAQ/RTFM site if existant...), Nogotheg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] small distro for PXE boot, autostarts sshd?
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE:small distro for PXE boot, autostarts sshd?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
