[Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comThu Feb 12 19:31:32 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > To be specific, the ext4 people are now promising that they aren't > going to change the on-disk format. That's very different from working > so well that you can definitely trust your production system to it... > which is something that will widely agreed upon after ext4 has made it > into mainstream distros, with all the extra QA that that involves. > > -- greg The limited scope of the patches as compared to ext3 means we're likely looking at a FS which already possesses good stability and predictable performance characteristics. You're right, however. FC11 (among others) will be the pudding. Much more interesting will be BtrFS. Being of similar complexity to ZFS and from a new code base, the testing will have to be quite long and intensive before it's truly trusted. The cycle will likely be similar to that which ZFS went through. -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
