[Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.orgThu Feb 12 11:52:56 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 01:27:56PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > 16TB ext3 support was included as a technology preview in RHEL5 and fully > supported in 5.1. I've got a couple of >8TB ext3 FSes. Why ext3? > Because nothing else is as well supported by the vendor on RHEL/CentOS. > For primary file servers, I don't want to muck about with add-on kernel > modules, "plus" kernels, or anything else of that sort. I want to run as > close to stock as possible. And on anything RHEL derived, that means > ext3. Don't you get creeping data corruption on 10+ worth of TByte drives? And not even RAID6? I'd definitely get drives from different batches, or preage them randomly. I'm speccing such a box right now with a Supermicro 2U box, and I'm going either for FreeNAS 0.7 (bleeding edge) or OpenSolaris/NexentaStor, both with zfs. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Problem with ext3 filesystem?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
