[Beowulf] itanium vs. x86-64
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
kyron at neuralbs.com kyron at neuralbs.comTue Feb 10 12:09:56 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] itanium vs. x86-64
- Next message: [Beowulf] itanium vs. x86-64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> kyron at neuralbs.com wrote: >>>> Next caliper allows to get a lot of diagnostics from the cpu (also >>>> because >>>> ia64 supports all that while x86-64 does not AFAICT) like number of >>>> bubbles >>>> in the pipeline, L2-cache misses, clock-cycles per line of C-code etc. >>> these are just the performance-counting MSR's, which are available >>> on Opterons as well as Xeons too. >> >> Even back to the PIII processors (and more?). Check out PAPI >> (http://icl.cs.utk.edu/papi/) for more details but, as an example, here >> is >> the output from an old cluster node: > > Oops. Well actually great to hear. Which profilers can benefit from all > this info? This monster suite (free!): http://www.cs.uoregon.edu/research/tau/docs.php Which I have been pushing around for a while and it's quite impressive IMHO. Weird thing is I seem to be the only one interested in profiling and metrics and all that gunk around here. Guess that will change now that it is actually possible to _measure_ the FLOPS your application _truely_ consumes thanks to these counters (I mean, for us laymans that never had access to such cool hardware :P ) > > toon > Eric
- Previous message: [Beowulf] itanium vs. x86-64
- Next message: [Beowulf] itanium vs. x86-64
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
