[Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
james bardin jbardin at bu.eduTue Dec 8 09:22:27 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Prentice Bisbal <prentice at ias.edu> wrote: > You'd hope that. Most of my current clusters users are scientific > researchers in academia, not computer scientists. While some are > extremely computer savvy, others have learned just enough about > programming to do their calculations. Expecting the latter to write code > with checkpointing is unrealistic, and working in academia, I can't > force them to. Which is why taking down 4 nodes instead of just one is > less than ideal. > I find it's still advantageous to push them to learn it. A researcher working with a tight deadline for a grant will often see the light when a hardware failure loses them a month or more of data processing. It really is in their own best interests to learn about their tools.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
