[Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgThu Dec 3 18:34:42 PST 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Bill Broadley" <bill at cse.ucdavis.edu> wrote: > Indeed. You'd hope that such long running jobs would checkpoint. They didn't at first, but when we asked them to they decided they were going to checkpoint all 2GB of RAM every minute. Over NFS. We got them to fix that.. > Seems like the perfect place for virtualization. ..or blcr! [...] > Seems like it would be real popular with the admins. > Anyone doing this? How does it deal with pinned DMA memory on NICs ? cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] New member, upgrading our existing Beowulf cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
