[Beowulf] Surviving a double disk failure
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgSun Apr 19 02:00:24 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Surviving a double disk failure
- Next message: [Beowulf] Surviving a double disk failure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- "Joe Landman" <landman at scalableinformatics.com> wrote: > We have 1 customer using 24 drives (22 for data with 2 hot spares) as > an md raid6 on DeltaV. Normally we'd suggest something smaller > (collections of RAID6 and then striping across them to form > RAID60's). In our paranoia after our bad IBM experience the new setup is a RAID-60 where the 4 RAID-6 components are just 4 x 1TB disks (Hitachi, FWIW). So our users are now spread over two of these, each with about 8TB usable. So far so good (plus we managed to almost double our disk capacity for users). cheers, Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03) 9925 4751 - Systems Manager The Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing P.O. Box 201, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia VPAC is a not-for-profit Registered Research Agency
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Surviving a double disk failure
- Next message: [Beowulf] Surviving a double disk failure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
