[Beowulf] Repenting for sins against Dell (on good Friday, no less)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comFri Apr 10 09:47:45 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Repenting for sins against Dell (on good Friday, no less)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Repenting for sins against Dell (on good Friday, no less)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/4/10 Mark Hahn <hahn at mcmaster.ca>: > > I'm not so sure about that - why would VMed windows be more secure? > my understanding is that the thing that makes windows vulnerable is the > hooks that make windows integration work. and it's the integration > that people expect, no? One reason you might want to do VM-ed Windows is if you have applications which run only under Windows, and equally you have users which have applications with run only under Linux. So you could have two boxes beside every desk, generating heat, needing care and maintenance. Or you could use Intel's new VD-T technology plus Nvidia Multi-OS http://www.nvidia.com/object/sli_multi_os.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Repenting for sins against Dell (on good Friday, no less)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Repenting for sins against Dell (on good Friday, no less)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
