Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Repeated Dell SC1435 crash / hang. How to get the vendor to resolve the issue when 20% of the servers fail in first year?

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Gerry Creager gerry.creager at tamu.edu
Mon Apr 6 12:53:33 PDT 2009


Jan Heichler wrote:
> Hallo Rahul,
> 
> 
> Montag, 6. April 2009, meintest Du:
> 
> 
> RN> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:46 AM, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org 
> <mailto:csamuel at vpac.org>> wrote:
> 
>> > Even though we could reproduce it on 64-bit Debian
> 
>> > and 32-bit CentOS they wouldn't escalate the issue
> 
>> > until we could reproduce it on RHEL5 - which we did
> 
>> > today.
> 
> 
> 
> RN> Thanks for sharing the anecdote Chris. I wonder if there is any clause
> 
> RN> in the contracts restricting us to run certain OS's.
> 
> 
> RN> So long as we are using a "reputable" well-tested OS I find it unfair
> 
> RN> that the vendors engage in so much arm-twisting. Is there any
> 
> RN> scientific evidence that the core kernels of Debian or Fedora or CenOS
> 
> RN> (that *is* essentially RHEL isn't it?) are any less reliable then
> 
> RN> RHEL? What is / are the distros of choice on the Beowulf community?
> 
> RN> Just getting a feel.
> 
> 
> RN> I have tried out cutting edge distros meant for scientific
> 
> RN> applications like ScientificLinux or ComputeNodeLinux but I've found
> 
> 
> ScientificLinux is - in fact - RHEL. So it is not more "cutting edge" 
> than CentOS... 
> 
> 
> RN> it more practical to stick to a larger, well used distro. No doubt I
> 
> RN> might take some performance cuts on the benchmarks but the simple
> 
> RN> reality of a larger user community out there makes it easier to debug
> 
> RN> stuff and get well-tested apps and code that will run on my Distro
> 
> RN> out-of-the box.
> 
> 
> I See that ScientificLinux has a huge community using it - at least in 
> Europe. Some big research institutes are using it (CERN for example) - 
> some projects set it as the default distro (D-Grid - a german GRID 
> project). 
> 
> 
> So i don't see you point here ;-)

And in the US, the Tier2 and Tier3 LHC participants are using 
ScientificLinux, too.  In fact, we've a couple of researchers here who 
will use no other distro.  you know, like RHEL or CentOS.  Too dangerous 
in their eyes.


gc



More information about the Beowulf mailing list