[Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tim Cutts tjrc at sanger.ac.ukSun Apr 5 01:39:05 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4 Apr 2009, at 10:29 pm, Jason Riedy wrote: > And Joe Landman writes: >> Good performance: >> ------------------ >> GlusterFS >> PVFS2 > > I don't suppose you've experimented with Ceph or POHMELFS? I just > attempted to build Lustre support for experimenting and remembered > why I avoid it. > > And Lustre already is in an odd spot. One high-level competitor to > Sun uses it, HP. They don't just use it. My understanding is that HP are (or at least were) the primary contractor for the Department of Defense, and had subcontracted it to CFS, who of course were subsequently bought by Sun. I definitely agree with you that it's an 'odd spot' politically, though. Neither company actually seems desperately interested in it. Tim -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
