[Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Glen Beane Glen.Beane at jax.orgFri Apr 3 16:20:32 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Efficient UPS Aids Google?s Extreme PUE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
________________________________________ From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Lindahl [lindahl at pbm.com] Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 4:32 PM To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 08:47:42AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:34:26AM +0800, Stuart Midgley wrote: > > > In 2019 when Intel releases their 1024core chip, still at 2.5GHz with > > 256GB dimm memory, a lot of people will be surprised that linux works > > Ain't going to work. Arguably doesn't work already beyond 8 cores > in a single socket. > > Will have to do with embedded memory or stacked 3d memory a la > http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~loh/Papers/isca2008-3Ddram.pdf We've been building bigger and bigger SMPs for a long time, making changes to improve the memory system as needed. How is multicore any different? memory bandwidth? The number of cores on a single CPU is growing much faster than the memory bandwidth to that CPU, right? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20090403/73decc87/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Efficient UPS Aids Google?s Extreme PUE
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
