[Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comThu Apr 2 16:11:05 PDT 2009
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> >> So, to get back to the original discussion, SGI disappearing from the >> landscape means one less option to choose from. > > You think SGI designed the hardware for their non-shared-memory > clusters? I don't thnk so. > > -- greg No, SGI use supermicro. But that isn't really the point. They did design their own shared memory systems and they will be sorely missed if they are not continued. We were really looking forward to a large shared memory x86 system. Hopefully it still eventuates. Having just purchased a heap of nehalem systems from SGI, the one thing we love about them is their fleet-of-foot. I can ask SGI for a quote, they understand what I want and get back to me within a day, no stuffing around. I ask Sun/IBM/HP for the same quote, 2 weeks later, 6 or 7 phone calls, 3 visits I still don't have a quote. Once they get it in, it is, without doubt, considerably more expensive and we have usually placed a PO with SGI 2 weeks prior.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Rackable / SGI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
