[Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N dnlombar at ichips.intel.comTue Sep 30 14:11:45 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:05:16AM -0700, Jon Forrest wrote: > Bogdan Costescu wrote: > > > I use for a long time a different approach - the node "image" is copied > > via rsync at boot time; the long waiting time for installing the RPMs > > and running whatever configuration scripts happens only once when the > > node "image" is prepared, the nodes only copy it - and it's a full copy > > only the first time they boot with a new disk, afterwards it's the rsync > > magic which makes it finish within seconds while making it look like a > > new disk :-) > > This is a good idea. Can you write more about this? That's not too far from the SystemImager approach, which has been installing clusters for a Very Long Time(TM). They provide tools to manage the capture (or create from scratch), an rsync-only update along with a kernel/initrd to do it all from scratch. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
