[Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Håkon Bugge hbugge at platform.comFri Sep 26 11:41:35 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 19:47 26.09.2008, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: >DYNA has 2 main solver types -- explicit >(iteration based) and implicit (matrix >inversion, essentially). If you're only using >one system and the explicit solver, then there's >no need for any MPI, as ls-dyna is multi-threaded. I ran both SMP version and MPP version of ls-dyna on a dual-socket quad-core CloverTown. On the Neon refined revised data set, the SMP version achieved 25 jobs/24h. The MPP version achieved 36 jobs/24h. Hence, if you're able to use the implicit solver, I advice you to use an MPI. Thanks, Håkon -- Håkon Bugge Chief Technologist mob. +47 92 48 45 14 off. +47 21 37 93 19 fax. +47 22 23 36 66 hbugge at platform.com Skype: hakon_bugge Platform Computing, Inc.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Next message: [Beowulf] mpich vs hp mpi performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
