[Beowulf] One network, or two?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Buccaneer for Hire. buccaneer at rocketmail.comTue Sep 23 15:23:09 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--- On Tue, 9/23/08, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] One network, or two? > To: beowulf at beowulf.org > Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 1:20 PM > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 03:21:55PM -0400, Joshua > Baker-LePain wrote: > > > In theory, it's a great idea. In practice, wiring > up an entire 2nd > > network gets to be a major PITA (as well as being > uncheap) as your > > cluster size increases. I've got ~350 nodes here, > and a 2nd set of > > cabling is really, really low on the list of projects > I'd like to tackle. > > I can name a bunch of 350 node clusters that have multiple > networks. > So, obviously, YMMV. > > -- greg We are putting in a large cluster as I write this-1250 compute nodes (10,000 cores). We are using two networks-one for management and monitoring (Gb) and one for production (10G). It works like a dream.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Next message: [Beowulf] One network, or two?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
