[Beowulf] RE: MS Cray
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Naveed Near-Ansari naveed at caltech.eduMon Sep 22 16:13:05 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 17, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Lux, James P wrote: > > > A big disadvantage of in-house is that it leads to an inventory of > ancient gear that becomes hard to maintain, and balkanized ownership > (we bought that for Project X, and though Project X is long gone, > the former staff of Project X still owns it). A big advantage of in- > house is that you can walk across the street and pick up an > oscilloscope. > > Jim We had some issues with these NASA owned machines in the previous department i worked for. Because of arcane rules of ownership and what could be done with these machines, they sat in a closet for years (they may still be there) because noone knew what could be legally done with these extrememly outdated and useless machines. Naveed
- Previous message: [Beowulf] RE: MS Cray
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: MS Cray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
