[Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
kyron at neuralbs.com kyron at neuralbs.comThu Sep 18 13:01:34 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:18:33PM +0100, John Hearns wrote: >> >> 2008/9/18 Eric Thibodeau <[1]kyron at neuralbs.com> >> >> Wooo...I think I'll explore this then with my new machines, >> link >> aggregation on the head node will come in handy for diskless nodes ;) >> >> These days, would you not be better speccing a 10Gbps ethernet >> card, >> and a switch with a couple of 10Gbps ports? > > Absolutely. That probably is cheaper than buying a switch that supports > bonding in a HPC sense (round-robin). > > Cheers, > Martin Oh..yeah...hrmpf... I'd have to wait for someone to want to get rid of their hot hot hot switch so I could do bonding (which I doubt my hardware supports). Guess I'll just fall back to aggregation through some TCP/IP addressing hacks ;)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Next message: [Beowulf] ethernet bonding performance comparison "802.3ad" vs Adaptive Load Balancing
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
