[Beowulf] Q: AMD Opteron (Barcelona) 2356 vs Intel Xeon 5460
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bill Broadley bill at cse.ucdavis.eduWed Sep 17 21:51:22 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: AMD Opteron (Barcelona) 2356 vs Intel Xeon 5460
- Next message: [Beowulf] hang-up of HPC Challenge
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sangamesh B wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Recently I benchmarked a Fortran based Scientific application on both > Intel Xeon Quad core and AMD Opteron Quad core with RHEL 5. Following are > the results: > > AMD-2.3GHz > INTEL-2.33GHz > > 1. Serial 147.719 > sec 73.952 sec > > 2. Parallel 4 core 39.798 > sec 32.317 sec > > 3. Parallel 8 core 26.880 > sec 30.371 sec Heh, so despite a slower compiler the better scalability of the opteron leads to a faster time with 8 cores. For a fairer test I'd suggest using the same compiler on both. > For AMD, I used GCC compiler(gfortran), which is released by AMD for > its barcelona-AMD fam10 based processors. Gfortran is definitely getting better, I'd still expect intel's compiler to have a significant advantage in most cases.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Q: AMD Opteron (Barcelona) 2356 vs Intel Xeon 5460
- Next message: [Beowulf] hang-up of HPC Challenge
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
