[Beowulf] Lustre failover
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netTue Sep 16 00:32:24 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lustre failover
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lustre failover
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Bernd, Mittwoch, 10. September 2008, meintest Du: BS> No, you can do active/active with several systems BS> Raid1 BS> / \ BS> OSS1 OSS2 BS> \ / BS> Raid2 BS> (Raid1 and Raid2 are hardware raid systems). BS> Now OSS1 will primarily serve Raid1 and OSS2 will primarily serve Raid2. So BS> you have an active active situation. this is not what you would call "active/active" in a HA-environment. If Server1 is DHCP-Server and Server2 is NFS-Server and both can take over the other service you have an "active/passive" DHCP and "active/passive" NFS. Ofr Lustre you have "active/passive" for the data on RAID1 and "active/passive" for the data on RAID2. But i know that in the Lustre world this scenario is called "active/active" because no hardware is idle ;-) Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20080916/f31f43ec/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Lustre failover
- Next message: [Beowulf] Lustre failover
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
