[Beowulf] Security issues
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comFri Oct 24 06:17:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Next message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Jon Aquilina wrote: > >> true but if there is something that isnt in there i would be more then >> willing to add it to the repo. > > But what is the ADVANTAGE of reducing the number of packages in a > warehouse from which one pulls packages, when the filled warehouse > already exists and is free? > > I don't know about Debian so much, but with RPM repos one can set up the > primary full-distro repo, and create as many "local" repos as one wishes > on the side (or link in to e.g. livna -- other repos other humans > maintain and that you trust). I can only presume that Debianish distros > can do the same. Yes, very much so. Many, many updated packages or packages of dubious legality (libdvdcss anyone?) are available in ancillary repositories. > So create a "cluster distro" as an OVERLAY on TOP of an existing distro. > That way you do far, far less work. All the distro packages are there > if you need them. Most of the cluster packages you might need are > already there. If you need to rebuild them, augment them with > non-distro packages, or e.g. add some custom kernels, build the > replacement/augmentations, package them, pop them in an overlay. Yum > will (if told to nicely) use them instead of the ones in the regular > distro. Or package the source packages and submit them upstream. Volunteer for a life of servitude! > Don't forget, of course, that then YOU are responsible for maintaining > the update stream of any packages you replace -- if the upstream version > is patched, you'd better (re-re-)patch your augmented version. > > This keeps the amount of work to the theoretical minimum required to > achieve your goals, costs you "nothing" (what does disk cost per GB > these days -- $0.20 or thereabouts? -- so keeping a full distro costs > you a few dollars, literally), and makes it extremely easy to track > updates and upgrades without YOU doing a ton of work. Usually when I build a cluster, I make local builds of MPICH2 for each compiler. This does not fit well with the paradigm of really any distro I've ever seen, which is why I leave it as a custom layer on top of e.g. Debian and do not package it. I have yet to see a distro do multiarch really well, so for the moment I try to work around (or perhaps above) the system and avoid using APT/YUM for handling multiple architectures/compiler toolchains. > > rgb > <snip> -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Next message: [Beowulf] Security issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
