[Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netThu Oct 23 05:34:03 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In message from Jan Heichler <jan.heichler at gmx.net> (Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:27:40 +0200): >Hallo Mikhail, > >Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2008, meintest Du: > >MK> In message from "Ivan Oleynik" <iioleynik at gmail.com> (Tue, 21 Oct >2008 >MK> 18:15:49 -0400): >>>I have heard that AMD Shanghai will be available in Nov 2008. Does >>>someone >>>know the pricing and performance info and how is it compared with >>>Barcelona? >>>Are there some informal comparisons of Shanghai vs Nehalem? > >MK> I beleive that Shanghai performance increase in comparison >w/Barcelona >MK> will be practically defined only by possible higher Shanghai >MK> frequencies. > >You can expect to see better performance in SPEC_CPU for Shanghai vs. >Barcelona when comparing identical clockspeeds. But of course the >increased clockspeed ist a big argument for Shanghai (or the same >clockspeed with less energy consumption). > >And Shanghai has some more features like faster memory and HT3 in >some of the later revisions i hope... Yes, I think HT3 *must* be. It was declared for Barcelona, but really is supported now AFAIK only for desktop chips. Mikhail > >Jan
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Next message: [Beowulf] Shanghai vs Barcelona, Shanghai vs Nehalem
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
