[Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eric Thibodeau kyron at neuralbs.comFri Oct 3 17:27:43 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Advanced Clustering's Breakin
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bogdan Costescu wrote: > On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Eric Thibodeau wrote: > >> the NFS root approach only does changes on the head node and changed >> files don't need to be propagated and are accessed on a as-needed >> basis, this might have significant impacts on large deployments > > NFS-root doesn't scale too well, the implementation of NFS in Linux is > quite chatty. Someone else responded to this, and expect even more scalability performance with NFSv4...lots more ;) > >> I'll take your word for it that they have a version tracking mechanism. > > Take my word that if you're going into larger installations with the > least amount of non-homogeneity you'll want to at least read about, if > not use, such mechanisms :-) > Well, "large" is relative, if I have a 32k core cluster with all identical HW, all I really need for this "large" installation is a single image.. It's the diversity that kills that then requires tight version/config tracking, even if all the images are managed from a single point..but that's trivial common sense ;) Eric
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Advanced Clustering's Breakin
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
