[Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns hearnsj at googlemail.comThu Oct 2 05:25:17 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2008/10/1 Donald Becker <becker at scyld.com> > > > It's foreseeable that holding an 8GB install > image in memory will be trivial, but that will be a few years in the > future, not today. And we will need better VM and PTE management to make > it efficient. > > > Hmmmm.... can I forsee Puppy Linux HPC Edition ???? http://www.puppylinux.org/ Being half serious here, is it worth trying to get one of these slimmed-down distros to the state where it will run an HPC job? Oh, and in addition to a barebones install for our contemplative cluster, they have a onebones install which cuts out the GUI (cue more dog puns). http://www.puppylinux.com/pfs/ looks interesting... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081002/7727b883/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
