[Beowulf] Has DDR IB gone the way of the Dodo?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netWed Oct 1 11:19:11 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Has DDR IB gone the way of the Dodo?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Has DDR IB gone the way of the Dodo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Prentice, Mittwoch, 1. Oktober 2008, meintest Du: PB> And what is the status of DDR? Are people still using it, or has it PB> already been replaced by QDR in the marketplace? DDR is still the most important Infiniband in the market. DDR provides enough bandwidth for most applications at the moment because most applications suffer from latency - not limited bandwidth. QDR is more interesting for building spine networks. And QDR might get more important if we see more cores in typical compute nodes. >> Cisco does appear to be transitioning to *other* technologies. Again, >> they aren't the only IB provider out there (seems such a shame, gobbling >> up TopSpin and then effectively discarding them). PB> What *other* technolgies are you talking about QDR IB, or something PB> other than IB altogether, like 10 Gb Ethernet, or something all new and PB> proprietary? Cisco is dropping IB - probably to go for 10GE. It was a short time for Cisco offering IB solutions - bur probably they weren't very successful. Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081001/5967224f/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Has DDR IB gone the way of the Dodo?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Has DDR IB gone the way of the Dodo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
