[Beowulf] Re: MOSIX2
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tony Travis ajt at rri.sari.ac.ukWed Oct 1 05:16:29 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MOSIX2
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jürgen Knödlseder wrote: > Hi Tony, > > in fact, I also patched SATA drivers in the 2.4.26-om kernel. Yet I > could so far not manage to > get the kernel working for my latest DELL PE1950 with a Perc 6i driver > ... maybe the megaraid_sas > driver I use is outdated ... Hello, Jurgen. I did have 'some' SATA support using 2.4.27-om1 from the ClusterKnoppix sources, but the drivers were very old. The 2.4 kernel *is* still supported at Kernel.org and the more recent SATA drivers worked a lot better. However, I don't want to invest a lot of time and effort keeping 2.4.xx-om1 alive without a critical mass of other openMosix users and developers. Sadly, whatever the virtues of openMosix, I think it is now becoming unsupportable for use on a 'production' Beowulf cluster. > I also search for LinuxPMI project information, but without any success. > So I share your feeling that > this projects is probably dead ... It's probably just as well, or I would be tempted to join in ;-) Tony. -- Dr. A.J.Travis, University of Aberdeen, Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, Greenburn Road, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, Scotland, UK tel +44(0)1224 712751, fax +44(0)1224 716687, http://www.rowett.ac.uk mailto:ajt at rri.sari.ac.uk, http://bioinformatics.rri.sari.ac.uk/~ajt
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: MOSIX2
- Next message: [Beowulf] Compute Node OS on Local Disk vs. Ram Disk
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
