[Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduFri Nov 21 16:47:23 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Franz Marini wrote: >>> The distinction between Tesla and GeForce cards is that the former have >>> no display output, they usually have more ram, and (but I'm not sure >>> about this one) they are clocked a little lower. >> both NV and ATI have always tried to segment "professional graphics" >> into a higher-margin market. this involves tying the pro drivers to >> features found only in the pro cards. > > True, although, as far as I remember, the only real distinction between > Quadro and GeForce cards are hardware support for antialiased lines which > is present in the former (I could be wrong though, and there may be some > more substantial differences)... The Quadro cards above a certain level (280 NVS or 580 NVS, I think - I never could keep track of model 3's) could do hardware stereo 3D graphics, which the Computational Chem/Molecular Modeling folks love, a d happily pay extra for it. The other nvidia model lines do not have this capability. -- Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
