[Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jan Heichler jan.heichler at gmx.netFri Nov 21 06:23:58 PST 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hallo Franz, Freitag, 21. November 2008, meintest Du: FM> That's simply not true. Every newer card from NVidia (that is, every FM> G200-based card, right now, GTX260, GTX260-216 and GTX280) supports DP, FM> and nothing indicates that NV will remove support in future cards, quite FM> the contrary. FM> The distinction between Tesla and GeForce cards is that the former have FM> no display output, they usually have more ram, and (but I'm not sure FM> about this one) they are clocked a little lower. Don't forget that Teslas have ECC-RAM. Normal Graphic cards don't care about flipped memory bits. That does not count when processing DirectX or OpenGL - but it does for computation. So a highend GPU can miscalculate... Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20081121/0f2df55e/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Next message: [Beowulf] What class of PDEs/numerical schemes suitable for GPU clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list