[Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue May 27 17:52:56 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Lux wrote: > The value of a supercomputer under the desk is primarily to the end user > (faster whatever to free up an expensive engineer's time). They don't > see much difference between buying the software for a single processor > or multiprocessor. The ISV won't get many incremental sales from having > a fast box to run it on, because the customer would probably buy it in Hmmm.... splitting proverbial hairs here ... If the total cost of the solution is X(hw)+Y(sw) (hardware and software), and the solution cost on an "accelerated" box is x(hw)+Y(sw), where x << X, then the ISV may be able to convince the customer to buy at least incrementally more licenses of the software (which at the engineering shops we have dealt with, tends to be one of the major limiting cases for use). Especially if N=Int(X/x) is large enough ( N>3 or so), then the ISV can convince the customer to save money buy more licenses, on less hardware for about the same performance. ISVs really want the end users to buy less hardware. Or, more accurately, less expensive hardware. This frees up more capital for ISV product purchases. We used to see this happening at SGI all the time, when a "partner" would badly underspecify the hardware, just to make sure the customer had enough money to pay full price for the software. Then we would bear the brunt of "its too slow" and wonder why they were told to buy an Indy or an O2 for their calculations ... > any case. The end user isn't interested in paying the ISV to port it to > the "supercomputer in a box" at least not on any scale comparable to the > actual cost of doing the port (i.e. they'd probably be willing to spend In most cases this is true. In some cases, where there is a critical business dependency, this lack of port could have a non-positive cascading effect. > <2x for the ported version, but they're also already forking out the > bucks for the box, too.. They tend to view that as the extent of what > they're willing to invest. We live in the era of "good enough". > > Jim -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Next message: [Beowulf] SiCortex experience anyone?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
