[Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N dnlombar at ichips.intel.comTue May 27 06:15:49 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:42:01PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2008, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > > >I generally prefer to just bulk install boxes by PXE booting them > >though -- less handwork. That requires a bit more work, but any SA > >worth his salt knows how to do that sort of thing. > > I agree that PXE is a powerful tool/methodology for scalable systems > administration, although that isn't really orthogonal to a suitably > designed flashdisk-bootable system. Yes and no. We have flash-bootable systems--that is, you can install your own "payload" in flash--and features related to boot device selection, e.g., PXE, are no longer available from the minimal BIOS that initializes the platform and launches your payload. Instead, you provide whatever boot services are relevant to the application. It turns out that providing reasonably general PXE client services can be provided by Busybox and a shell script in about 380 lines. Such capability includes using TCP and a highly scalable web- server for delivery allowing you to get *well* beyond the scaling limits of even atftp. -- David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
