[Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joel Jaeggli joelja at bogus.comWed May 21 13:00:08 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2008, Eugen Leitl wrote: > >> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:36:24PM +0100, Kozin, I (Igor) wrote: >>> >>>> b) Laptops. I'd REALLY like a flash-driven laptop. >>> >>> Who wouldn't? But what's the typical lifespan of flash memory? >> >> Current SSDs claim >1 Mh MTBF, largely due to wear-leveling. > > A Mh is, lessee, 100 years? So one failure per hundred systems per > year? Or if it is truly due to wear, perhaps it is zero failures per > hundred systems for 50 years, then an increasing failure rate out to > 100+? > > If it is wear, however, lifetimes may depend on usage, and using it as a > root fs and/or home directory may significantly shorten lifetime. given a 300,000 cycle rated life span, a solid wear-leveling algorithm, and a controller that groups and shadows incomplete writes you can write to a 16GB flash drive at 20MB/s for 9 years before it exceeding it's warranted cycle life. It used to be fairly trivial to exercise a given block until it failed, but by in large that won't happen anymore. > rgb > >> >> >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: ECC support on motherboards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
