[Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue May 20 13:41:01 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mix different drives in RAID (WD4000YR and WD5000YS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 03:10:26PM -0400, Joe Landman wrote: > >> StarCD. Not big transfers, it doesn't move GB to its nodes. > > By big I mean 100s of kbytes. I thought that this class of CDF Ahh.... got it. Yeah, it does that. Actually a few megs between nodes (halo/shadows) > computation, which uses a lot of memory, also does quite big transfers > along the interfaces between the nodes. Yes. Big is of course relative ... :) > > I agree with you that real application benchmarks are a fine thing. > However, this one only has 2 datapoints for 1 application at 1 data > size+node count with a potentially bogus MPI implementation, so it's > bit hard to interpret. Rather hard to draw inferences (well apart from a binary yes/no) > >> As Ammasso is out of business, this is sadly nothing we could really use >> these days. > > Never fear, there are a half-dozen vendors selling 10 gbit TOE cards. > And nary a benchmark to be found. (virtual coffee spew) :) -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Next message: [Beowulf] Mix different drives in RAID (WD4000YR and WD5000YS)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
