[Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pbm.comTue May 20 11:46:12 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman wrote: > Contrary to the detractors of the technologies comments, the > TOE/RDMA card *did* provide fairly significant performance delta for > real apps running MPI over gigabit ethernet. As a detractor of TOEs, I should point out that one data point does not prove that it's common that apps get a benefit. I'd be willing to bet that this app was doing extremely large transfers, and maybe even managed to get more concurrency with the TOE... which could easily be a flaw in the MPI implementation's TCP driver, a pretty common thing to be wrong. For example, LAM was always much better than MPICH over TCP, and I wouldn't be surprised if OpenMPI continues this superiority over MPICH-2. The most interesting thing, to me, is that the various people selling TOEs in the HPC arena publish almost no benchmarks. What's the message rate and N1/2? The only N1/2 I've ever seen published was 100 kbytes. (Obviously I'm not including Myricom in this bucket: they do publish microbenchmarks.) -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Capacity / Capability Computing
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: TOE on Linux
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
