[Beowulf] TOE on Linux?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Prentice Bisbal prentice at ias.eduTue May 20 11:11:51 PDT 2008
- Previous message: [Beowulf] TOE on Linux?
- Next message: [Beowulf] mandatory use of command qsub
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
John Hearns wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 18:42 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > >>> 1. Is having 10 GbE and Inifiniband in the same cluster overkill, or at >>> least unorthodox? This cluster will be used by a variety of users >>> >> I would say so - if you've got IB, why add another interface? >> I'm not suggesting getting rid of gigabit, since its cost is >> near-zero and ethernet _is_ the network. OTOH, if there were a >> form of ethernet that competed with IB in price/latency/bandwidth, >> there would be no reason to go IB. >> > I back up what Mark says. > > If you want to use 10Gig, put a 10Gig interface in your NFS server and > choose a switch with a suitable 10Gig port (or ports) plus 1gig ports. > Use the existing onboard 1gig interfaces on your nodes for the NFS > traffic. > You don't say what size, in number of compute nodes, your cluster will > be. It is very simplistic to think of simply throwing bandwidth at an > NFS solution and thinking this will solve everything - it won't. > Do you REALLY expect to saturate 1gig interfaces? > The NFS Server will be a NetApp product with a 10 Gb interface, and our switches will also have 10 GbE ports. The cluster will be 48-64 nodes. No, I do not exepct to saturate the 1 Gb interfaces. I was not the one who spec'd the system, but I will be responsible for configuring and supporting it. Prentice
- Previous message: [Beowulf] TOE on Linux?
- Next message: [Beowulf] mandatory use of command qsub
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
